Maybe more logical choices are available keeping in mind the reasons stated for wanting to keep the house. Perhaps less costly housing alternatives are available in the same neighbourhood so that that kids can go to the same school and have the same friends. Maybe the newer housing alternative may be a benefit from other points of view like, no memories of married life and less upkeep. Perhaps less expensive housing alternatives can also give her the opportunity to save for retirement, as well.
In my example, I talked about the wife wanting to keep the house but men have other challenges in their financial decisions, especially if they are paying child and/or spousal support. A little less often but becoming more common place that in past years is the issue of the wife paying support to her husband, especially since women have been advancing in their business careers and the same types of issues need to be considered in this scenario.
The power of the financial neutral in a divorce situation is to draw out these conclusions before the financial errors are set in motion. Often clients do not want to pay an additional professional (other than their lawyer) to help with the divorcing process but my argument is, "How can you afford not to?"